What is Pure Rawz's composite score?

80/100. The composite is the weighted average of shipping (82/100), pricing (85/100), support (76/100), and COA quality (80/100). See /methodology for the rubric.

Has vialaudit placed a test order with Pure Rawz?

Not yet. Pure Rawz is currently a public-data audit. We aggregate vendor disclosures, third-party COA mirrors, community signals, and operating-history evidence. A first-hand test order is pending.

Where does Pure Rawz ship?

US. Domestic shipping typically arrives in 4 days.

affiliate disclosure · we earn commission on some vendor links. audits, scores, and rankings are independent — vendors do not pay for placement. read more →

vendor audit · public-data tier

Is Pure Rawz legit?

Pure Rawz is operating and surfaces credible public signals (composite 80/100), but we have not placed a first-hand test order yet — this is a public-data audit. Long-running US-domestic vendor with broad catalog and third-party COAs. Frequently named in r/Peptides as a stable mid-tier option; first-hand audit pending. The signal table below shows what we verified and what is still open.

PREVIEW · NO TEST ORDER YET80/100 composite

Synthesized from public signals — first-hand audit pending. Last reviewed 2026-04-30.

Signal table

Status

Active

Audit tier

public-data only

Composite score

80/100· PREVIEW — synthesized from public signals, first-hand audit pending

Ships to

Payment

crypto, card

Last reviewed

2026-04-30

What works, what does not

pros

+Multi-year operating history with no public regulatory action against the peptide catalog
+Third-party COAs published on flagship SKUs with batch IDs
+Competitive pricing — typically below cycle median on the GLP-1 mainstream
+Wide catalog spanning research peptides + ancillary research compounds

cons

−Customer-service responsiveness reported as inconsistent in community threads
−Mixed COA quality across the long tail — flagship SKUs are tested more rigorously than niche items
−This profile is preview-data only — first-hand audit pending

What we mean by "legit"

We do not use "legit" as a single yes-or-no signal. A vendor is legit when four things hold: identifiable corporate operator, third-party or independently-mirrored COAs, shipping and payment infrastructure that consistently delivers, and a complaint history that surfaces real issues rather than vanishes them. Our composite score is the weighted average of those four — shipping, pricing, support, COA quality — and you can read the full rubric at /methodology.

For Pure Rawz the audit is "public-data tier" — we aggregate vendor disclosures, third-party COA mirrors, operating-history evidence, and complaint patterns. A first-hand test order is still pending and the page will be upgraded when that lands.

Verdict

READ FULL AUDIT →

one-line verdict

Long-running US-domestic vendor with broad catalog and third-party COAs. Frequently named in r/Peptides as a stable mid-tier option; first-hand audit pending.

composite 80/100 · audit tier public-data · last reviewed 2026-04-30